Web 2.0

In trying to explain to my cynical friend why I don’t agree with him, I was actually a little stumped at one point in recalling some simple ways to illustrate why Web 2.0 is different to Web 1.0.

 

….This afternoon, I was in a Skype discussion ….and part of our conversation strayed into a discussion about Web 2.0. Understanding web 2.0

I actually used WEB1.0 TECHNOLOGY (Email and Mailinglists) to produce BLOGS!!! OH NO!

How can that be, how can I use an excellent editor of my choice and write comfortably with all the necessary amenities and still blog? Even better I don’t need to use some dumb proprietary blogging program. I can use the power of my fully featured email client. With a mailinglist I have submission control handled for me and it allows multiple posters to work together to produce posts! OH NO SOCIAL TECHNOLOGY ALMOST AS OLD AS YOUR PARENTS. Too bad too many of the Web2.0 weenies are too inept to use and interface with technologies people know how to use @_@. If you want me to use flock, let me use my editor, it is real. Has arrived.

 

Top-Heavy!

Raw score: 48% Big Breasts, 40% Big Ass, and 52% Cute!.

Ja, we zijn altijd wel te vinden voor een testje, en als het testje dan nog de in het oog springende titel heeft van “The Tits, Ass and Cuteness Test” dan kunnen we er niet omheen. Volgens deze test val ik voor het type Top Heavy. Ja, wat eigenlijk niet volgens mijn verwachtingen was.

Maar ik kan mij wel vinden in de Recommended Celebrity: Angelina Jolie. Geen slechte keuze, daar kan ik nu zeer goed mee leven.

Based on your selections, the results are clear: you show an attraction to larger breasts, smaller asses, and sexier composures than others who’ve taken the test. Note that you like women thin and top-heavy. This is best achieved with plastic surgery, but some specimens do exist in nature. My third variable, “cuteness” is a mostly objective measure of how innocent a given model looked. It’s determined by a combination of a lot of factors: lack of dark eye makeup, facial expression, posture, etc. If you scored high on that variable, you are either really nice OR you’re into deflowering teens. If you scored low, you are attracted to raunchier, sexier, women. In your case, your lower than average score suggests you appreciate a sluttier look. Kudos!

My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: You scored higher than 48% on tit-size You scored higher than 33% on ass-size You scored higher than 29% on cuteness